Very useful are the translations by D
D. R. Owen, Guillaume le Clerc, Fergus of Galloway: Knight of King Arthur (London and Rutland, VT, 1991) – earlier published con Arthurian Literature 8 (1989), 79–183 – which has excellent notes and appendices, and R. Wolf-Bonvin, La Chevalerie des sots. Le roman de Fergus. Trubert, fabliau du XIIIe siecle (Paris, 1990). For convenience all references puro Chretien’s works are onesto the texts which appeared con the Lettres Gothiques series and are reprinted by Michel Zink, Chretien de Troyes: Romans, Classiques Modernes, La Pochotheque (Paris, 1994): including Erec et Enide; Cliges; Le Chevalier de la Charette (or Le Roman de Lancelot); Le Chevalier au Lion (or Le Roman d’Yvain); Le Conte du Graal (or Le Roman de Perceval). All translations are taken from Owen, Fergus, and Chretien de Troyes, Arthurian Romances, trans. D. D. R. Owen (London and Rutland, VT, 1987; rep. 1991). See Owen, Fergus, pp. 162–69 and his articles referred to below. The oldest of the Dutch romances, it is generally attributed sicuro two authors, the first following the version now offered by the Chantilly manuscript of Fergus, and the second (lines 2593–5604) working from memory. See Dutch Romances vol. 2: Ferguut, di nuovo. D. F. Johnson and G. H. M. Claassens (Cambridge, 2000), who suggest (p. 6) verso date for Fergus of the first quarter of the thirteenth century. On the basis of his doctoral dissertation, now published as Op zoek naar Galiene: over de Oudfranse Fergus en de Middelnederlandse Ferguut (Amsterdam, 1991), R. M. T. Zemel suggests that Fergus may even date from as early as c. 1200. L. Spahr, ‘Ferguut, Fergus, and Chretien de Troyes’, con Traditions and Transitions: Studies con Honor of Harold Jantz, ancora. L. Addirittura. Kurth et al. (Munich, 1972), pp. 29–36. The unique manuscript of Ferguut is dated preciso the middle of the fourteenth century: see Ferguut and Galiene: A Facsimile of the only extant Middle Dutch manuscript, University Library Leiden, Letterkunde 191, with an introduction by M. J. M. de Haan (Leiden, 1974).
No comment on dating is made by B
eighteen locations durante all) with verso glance north of the Forth onesto Escoche proper (cf. line 2589, ‘En Eschoce u en Lodien’). The journey times indicated are realistic and the narrator offers verso number of apparently informed comments on local customs. The ‘Scottishness’ of Fergus is thus firmly established and is preciso be taken seriously.4 Arthur’s seat at ‘Carduel en Gales’, usually taken to be Carlisle, is familiar from many of the romances as is the region of Strathclyde mediante general. The originality of the Fergus author is sicuro have abandoned the more conventional Scottish toponymy for places, like Galloway, with a much less reassuring reputation, thereby extending Scotland’s appearance sopra romance literature. There have been several attempts preciso interpret the work as per some sense an ‘ancestral romance’, whether written for Alan of Galloway (d. 1234), great-grandson of the historical Fergus, on the occasion of his marriage c. 1209, or John of Balliol (per stepson of Alan) and his wife Devorguilla per the period 1234–41 preciso strengthen the claim of their eldest bourdonnement Hugh preciso the Scottish throne.5 There has even been an attempt esatto identify the author with William Malveisin, verso royal clerk of French partita, who ended his career as bishop of St Andrews (1202–1238).6 Such researches, speculative though they must remain, justify the inclusion of Fergus durante any history of literature in Scotland,7 though it might be said that if any of them were true, it would be puzzling that the author did not give clearer clues esatto his identity or political purpose.8 The Scottish connection need not, however, mean that the work was actually written in Scotland or composed by verso writer resident there – a writer who calls himself simply ‘Guillaume le clerc’ (line 7004). The two surviving manuscripts, from www.datingranking.net/it/muddy-matches-review/ the second half of the thirteenth century, are both marked by Picardisms and one of them by traces of Walloon. So far as the poet’s own dialect is concerned, he seems preciso be writing per the more or less standard literary French of northern France.9 One of the manuscripts is the famous collection of continental Arthurian texts MS Chantilly, Musee Conde 472 from which Fergus was edited by both Ernst Martin (1872) and Wilson Frescoln (1983),10 and the other is Paris, BNF fr. 1553, a vast collection of fifty-two items including the Roman de Troie, the